Someone sent me a link at work saying how poor Android is.  I had to respond.

Update: Silly me, forgot to include the original link.

This is my email:

> Android OS (whilst hidden behind the beauty that is HTC Sense) is an inherently geeky, inconsistent, temperamental and beta-like OS.

  • geeky: yes (and in my opinion, that’s a good thing. not everyone is an apple fanboy) :)
  • temperamentaland beta-like: to some degree, yes.  give it time to mature a bit more.  every iteration it improves drastically.  Google isn’t sitting still

> It responds inconsistently to what should be basic functions of a phone

  • Agreed.  That is sometimes annoying.  Slow to load the phone dialer.  Easily fixed via software update.

> Exchange sync having random hiccups.

  • Never noticed any problems with this.  I use the exchange sync for work email and have always had my email there when i wanted it.

> The limitation of the OS not allowing you to install applications onto the microSD card

  • 100% agree with this one.  It’s SUPER annoying and aggravating.  It limits how many apps i can have, how large and complex apps can be.  Google has said they’re working on this and with a future software update this will no longer be an issue.

> Auto memory management is poor at best.

  • Not sure i agree with this.  There is an excellent article here by a Google engineer involved in this that details how and why they did things the way they did.  http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2010/04/multitasking-android-way.html .  That being said, there are a few poorly designed apps that don’t play nice with Google’s best practices for memory management.  My response: Don’t use those apps.  They will get low market ratings and bad comments so you can easily avoid them.  And there are always a dozen alternatives that don’t have the problem.

> Android is not and can not be an “iPhone Killer”, nor really even a competitor.

  • I’m always annoyed when someone says “Android is an iPhone killer.  It’s not.  But i do think it’s a valid competitor.  Especially with the newer versions of the OS and the newer hardware (Droid Incredible, Nexus One, EVO 4g).  It’s numbers are growing like crazy.  In fact, last quarter, Android outsold iPhone.  (Both of which are behind RIM, which itself is waaaay behind Nokia).

> The Android market is disjointed, confused and inconsistent, whilst Apple have created a stable, consistent platform that whilst limiting in some ways, allows users a level of comfort that Android does not.

  • Apple-fan boy speak there.  I 100% disagree with this statement.  It’s precisely Apple’s “stable, consistent platform … limiting in some ways” that has made me have absolutely no interest in doing personal development for iPhone OS.  I don’t want someone telling me what i can and can’t put on the market.  “Oh, we don’t like your app, sorry”.  and people with big public forums or insider clout at apple get their apps through anyway, where the little guy wouldn’t.
  • And it’s exactly the disjointed, confused, and inconsistent Android market that excites me.  It’s challenging.  Yes – you have different screen resolutions and OS versions.  All of which are documented in detail and EASY to code for and test in the emulators.  It adds maybe an hour of time to do a little testing for different screen sizes.  So what?  And hey – i can publish anything, anytime.  If it’s crap or malware, the market will rate it poorly and nobody will download it.

> Ask older Android handset owners if they enjoy being stuck on Android 1.5

  • He has a point here.  My response: Get a new phone. How long do people keep their phones on average nowadays?  usually the 1-2 year contract from their carriers.

> you can now walk into almost any store anywhere in the world and buy an accessory for an iPhone.

  • That is a also a good point.  But i have no trouble finding accessories on Amazon.  I rarely walk into a store to buy any tech accessories anymore…  Plus it’s cheaper.  You can get a standard micro-usb cable for $5.  You don’t have to pay $30 for a special iphone cable :)

> Too many form factors. Too much variance in OS versions. Too many product releases, too quickly.

  • I think that’s a good thing.  Choice.  You don’t like phone x?  Try phone y.  You want something fixed?  You won’t have to wait long for it, because the releases happen quickly.  Release early, release often.

Both sides of the argument have merit, and i think that both OS’s have a place.  iPhone rocks, no doubt about it.  But don’t discount android as over and done with.  It’s not going anywhere but up.  The more choices consumers have, the better.

Share

I had a big old post written up, and was just tweaking it here and there before posting when my computer crashed.  I thought macbook’s weren’t supposed to do that sort of thing.  Oh well.

I’m too lazy to recreate the entire thing, but i’ll just outline some of the main topics i was discussing.

Which is better – an eInk device, or a tablet device?  Or another way to say it would be “If you were to go shopping today, would you buy a kindle or an iPad”?

Kindle has several advantages:

  • Battery life lasts forever.  I sometimes go weeks without charging.  And i use my kindle almost every day for an hour or two at night before bed.  Of course, this is with the wireless turned off.  I only turn it on when i want to transfer a new book i’ve purchased via the “whispernet”.  And to be honest, most of the books on my kindle are not from Amazon and so i just sync them via the cable.
  • You can view in direct sunlight.  The brighter the better.  Do you want to read outside on a warm sunny, summer day?  I sometimes do.  And this works perfectly for that.
  • It’s amazingly easy on the eyes and the device fades into the background.  You quickly forget you’re reading on a device and are just focusing on the story.
  • You can read the same book on multiple devices (thanks to the Kindle app) and pick up wherever you left off (at least, assuming the book was purchased through Amazon).

Kindle has several disadvantages:

  • The eInk refresh rate is slow.
  • The display is greyscale.
  • It’s difficult to annotate and there’s not really a good way to search / share your annotations.
  • You can’t read it in the dark without a light.  Do you like to read in bed at night with the lights off?  I do.  All the time.

iPad has several advantages:

  • Sleek interface
  • Fast
  • Has the Kindle app, as well as a native ebook reader
  • The screen looks beautiful (especially in the dark at night lying in bed)
  • Easy to add annotations
  • Would be easy to add sharing features, animation, colors, embedded media content, etc..

iPod has several disadvantages:

  • Apple
  • Apple
  • closed, ferrari device with a pinto engine
  • can’t view very well in the light at all.  no reading on the beach or in the backyard unless you’re in the shade and the sun isn’t on the device

So which would i choose?  I have a kindle.  I love my kindle.  I wouldn’t buy it again at this time because of up and coming alternatives.  I also don’t plan to get an ipad.  I’ve been playing with one now for a week or two and it’s nice, but there will be nicer devices (and probalby cheaper) coming out in a few months.  I’ll probably get one of those.

Yes, eInk is better than some type of lcd display on a tablet, but bottom line? It’s not THAT much better that it really makes much of a difference.  Maybe in a few years eInk will be faster and prettier, but for now … it’s had its day and it’s time to move on.  Maybe a dual eInk screen/traditional screen “fold-up book-form tablet” is the way to go.  Then you get the best of both worlds (except that it won’t be as thin or “sleek” as an iPad).

Share

I’ve heard lots of people talking about how the Kindle is dead now that the iPad is out.  I just don’t see it.  It’s cool … i guess.  Actually from what i’ve seen, i wasn’t all that blown away.  It’s pretty.  But it’s not much more than a keyboardless netbook.  Not a lot of processing power.  Sure, it can do ebook reading, but so can about a hundred other devices.

The think i really love about the Kindle is that it’s not a fancy pretty gadget.  It does one thing, and it does it extremely well.  When you’re reading, the Kindle fades into the background and you don’t even notice it.  You’re focused on the story you’re reading, not the technology gadget you’re reading it on.  As it should be.

Share

About 4 1/2 years ago i blogged about work on 3D operating systems. Not a lot has really happened in this space between then and now. However, Apple is supposedly working on a 3D OS. Here’s a link to a detailed article about what they’re up to. With much faster processors and better video cards it seems much more tenable to do nowadays. I am still looking forward to a 3D os that’s gamelike. This isn’t quite that, but it would be a great step in that direction.

Share
Jan 142007

A picture is worth a thousand words. I think this sums up Apple’s strategy nicely:



Share
© 2013 The Hawker Squawker Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha